AIRLINK 136.59 Increased By ▲ 9.32 (7.32%)
BOP 9.12 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (5.07%)
CNERGY 6.42 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (12.24%)
CPHL 64.66 Decreased By ▼ -2.44 (-3.64%)
FCCL 41.55 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (4.24%)
FFL 13.04 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (6.8%)
FLYNG 33.77 Increased By ▲ 2.37 (7.55%)
HUBC 125.77 Increased By ▲ 6.77 (5.69%)
HUMNL 11.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.35%)
KEL 4.01 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.3%)
KOSM 3.99 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.27%)
MLCF 63.32 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (4.02%)
OGDC 184.55 Increased By ▲ 5.16 (2.88%)
PACE 4.42 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (10.78%)
PAEL 40.22 Increased By ▲ 3.21 (8.67%)
PIAHCLA 12.23 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-9.94%)
PIBTL 7.62 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (7.32%)
POWER 13.87 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (3.43%)
PPL 138.86 Increased By ▲ 6.95 (5.27%)
PRL 24.56 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.24%)
PTC 17.54 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.63%)
SEARL 68.24 Increased By ▲ 1.59 (2.39%)
SSGC 27.69 Decreased By ▼ -1.53 (-5.24%)
SYM 12.68 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (4.19%)
TELE 5.94 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (6.07%)
TPLP 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (3.7%)
TRG 56.27 Increased By ▲ 3.14 (5.91%)
WAVESAPP 7.94 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.58%)
WTL 1.16 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (5.45%)
YOUW 3.21 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (3.88%)
BR100 11,241 Increased By 384.8 (3.54%)
BR30 32,134 Increased By 1400.2 (4.56%)
KSE100 107,175 Increased By 3647.8 (3.52%)
KSE30 32,648 Increased By 1170 (3.72%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) held that an appeal in the NAB cases cannot be placed before a division bench for its disposal.

The court observed that if the NAB cases are directly fixed or filed before a division bench, it will deny a party’s right to file appeal against the order of a single judge.

The court passed this order in a petition of Aamir Nawaz praying the court to direct the NAB for expediting the process of an inquiry against him.

The court directed the office to fix the petition before a single bench and warned the office to take due care in future to ensure the categorisation of cases at the time of their filing whether they are to be placed before a single bench or a division bench.

The court observed that no provision is available under the NAB ordinance which deals with direct placement of matters before the division bench of high court except the appeals arising out of final judgment or order of the court under section 32 of the ordinance.

The court said there are a plethora of judgments of this court whereby the single bench alone heard and decided the NAB matters.

The court observed that any matter in constitutional jurisdiction of the high court will be referred, heard and disposed of by a single bench unless provided by law or the rules or the order of the Chief Justice.

The court observed that it is inalienable right of every person to be treated as per law and rule of justice which has two major components including access to justice and dispensation of justice.

The court said, Article 10-A of the Constitution deals with right of fair trial and due process and Article 4 deals with enjoyment of protection of law and to be treated as per law.

The court said the LHC rule outlines the procedure for presenting a particular type of petition, before a single judge for its decision unless the Chief Justice orders something different.

The court; therefore, directed the office to circulate a copy of this judgment to the additional registrars (Judicial) of all the LHC benches for compliance.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

200 characters
OSZAR »